|
|
|
Cost Study Inputs and Methodologies
- Delaware
- An illustration of the importance of various model inputs, including fill factors, depreciation, and cost of capital.
- View the document
- Delaware
- A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed capital structure.
- View the document
- Delaware
- A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed fiber use.
- View the document
- Delaware
- A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed fill factors.
- View the document
- Indiana
- An analysis of the inputs to GTE's Integrated Cost Model (ICM) and a discussion of whether they meet Commission-set standards.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A review and analysis of SWBT's collocation cost study, including a discussion of the reasonableness of power cost estimates.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A compliance analysis for SWBT's non-recurring cost studies, including labor costs, fall out rates, electronic ordering, and dedicated outside plant (DOP) assumptions.
- View the document
- Kansas
- An overview of SWBT's cost study methodology and difficulties encountered when attempting to review its studies.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's non-recurring cost studies for UNEs.
- View othe document
- Kansas
- A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's loop cost studies.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's switching cost studies.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A summary, description, and analysis of some miscellaneous SWBT cost studies and issues, including its transport study, DIP/DOP, and the use of embedded costs.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A critique of SWBT's assumed labor costs.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A critique of SWBT's assumed inflation factors.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A critique of SWBT's assumed fill, building, and maintenance factors.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A critique of SWBT's use of embedded data.
- View the document
- Kansas
- A critique of SWBT's approach to common costs.
- View the document
- New Hampshire
- A critique of Bell Atlantic's procedures for estimating OSS onset costs.
- View the document
- New Hampshire
- A critique of Bell Atlantic's non-recurring cost studies and inputs.
- View the document
- New Jersey
- A discussion of firm-developed cost study results for certain UNEs, including the network interface device (NID), the local loop, and end office switching.
- View the document
- Ohio
- A critique of Cincinnati Bell's low assumed fill factors.
- View the document
Other Testimony Topics
|
|
