utilityregulation.com Your best source for in-depth information about regulated industries.  
  Home Contact Search Sitemap
  Welcome
Essays
Orders
Reports
testimony
Links
feedback



Cost Study Inputs and Methodologies

Delaware
An illustration of the importance of various model inputs, including fill factors, depreciation, and cost of capital.
View the document

Delaware
A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed capital structure.
View the document

Delaware
A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed fiber use.
View the document

Delaware
A critique of Bell Atlantic's assumed fill factors.
View the document

Indiana
An analysis of the inputs to GTE's Integrated Cost Model (ICM) and a discussion of whether they meet Commission-set standards.
View the document

Kansas
A review and analysis of SWBT's collocation cost study, including a discussion of the reasonableness of power cost estimates.
View the document

Kansas
A compliance analysis for SWBT's non-recurring cost studies, including labor costs, fall out rates, electronic ordering, and dedicated outside plant (DOP) assumptions.
View the document

Kansas
An overview of SWBT's cost study methodology and difficulties encountered when attempting to review its studies.
View the document

Kansas
A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's non-recurring cost studies for UNEs.
View othe document

Kansas
A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's loop cost studies.
View the document

Kansas
A summary, description, and analysis of SWBT's switching cost studies.
View the document

Kansas
A summary, description, and analysis of some miscellaneous SWBT cost studies and issues, including its transport study, DIP/DOP, and the use of embedded costs.
View the document

Kansas
A critique of SWBT's assumed labor costs.
View the document

Kansas
A critique of SWBT's assumed inflation factors.
View the document

Kansas
A critique of SWBT's assumed fill, building, and maintenance factors.
View the document

Kansas
A critique of SWBT's use of embedded data.
View the document

Kansas
A critique of SWBT's approach to common costs.
View the document

New Hampshire
A critique of Bell Atlantic's procedures for estimating OSS onset costs.
View the document

New Hampshire
A critique of Bell Atlantic's non-recurring cost studies and inputs.
View the document

New Jersey
A discussion of firm-developed cost study results for certain UNEs, including the network interface device (NID), the local loop, and end office switching.
View the document

Ohio
A critique of Cincinnati Bell's low assumed fill factors.
View the document



Other Testimony Topics                                                                             


Copyright ©1996-2008 Ben Johnson Associates, Inc.® All Rights Reserved